Your Location: HiExpat.com Blogs Chungdam, Native English...

Korea Blog

If you are interested in having your blog syndicated on HiExpat, please contact us directly at danb@hiexpat.com. Any Blog entry that advertises a business entity will be removed without notice.
Feb 23
e73414

Chungdam, Native English teachers in dispute (Korea times)

Posted by: e73414 in Teaching  

Tagged in: Untagged 

This story is from today's Korea Times article

Chungdam Learning, a leading English language institute here, has been accused of having not paid severance pay and other allowances to native English teachers who have completed their contracts. 


Nine Americans who worked at the institute’s three branches in Seoul filed a collective petition with a labor ministry office, Tuesday, demanding the institute pay a total of 140 million won ($124,500) in overdue pay. 

The petitioners, who claim they were “permanent employees” of the institute, said they worked “under tight control” of the institute — running classes for 26 hours, five days a week with the academy-designated teaching material and code of conduct with an hourly pay ranging between 32,000 and 45,000 won. 

However, Chungdam has insisted they were “freelance teachers,” refusing to offer severance pay and to compensate for work on holidays and weekends when they finished their jobs last year. Freelance workers are not subject to the disputed payments, according to the institute. 

They were not entitled to paid leave. They also claim that no compensation was given for a 20-hour training session they underwent before being included as Chungdam’s faculty members, which was in violation of the country’s Labor Standards Act, the teachers said in their petition. 

“The petitioners should be seen as permanent workers hired by the academy,” said Jung Bong-soo, a labor attorney who filed the petition on behalf of the nine. 

“Their teaching activities were tightly controlled by the institute’s management, which is key evidence refuting the academy’s allegation that they were freelancers.” 

Jung added the academy’s allegation doesn’t make sense, given the nature of the E-2 English teaching visa that is issued to English-speaking foreigners invited to Korea by a Korean employer. 

Chungdam insists that the nine were hired as freelancers so that it does not have to pay the disputed compensation. 

“We inform all teachers at the academy of the contract terms. So we believe that the nine petitioners were fully aware of their status while on duty,” said a Chungdam spokesman anonymously. 

“We will try to settle the problem as early as possible.” 

The spokesman refused to elaborate on the issue since he has yet to receive official documentation regarding the case from the labor office. 

According to Chungdam, all native English teachers at its 14 branches across the country are employed under the same contract terms — as of January 349 foreigners work for the institute. 

The labor attorney Jung expects many of them to file similar petitions against Chungdam if the court rules in favor of the petitioners. 

Andrew Krebsbach, one of the nine petitioners, said they took the action to send the message that the growing community of “expatriates living in Korea and offering their services to businesses will no longer tolerate prejudicial labor practices.” 

“Ensuring fair and equal treatment for its increasingly multiethnic workforce is a step Korea must take in order to continue its dynamic growth in the next decade, which is something I believe all of us living in Korea today desire,” Krebsbach said. 

Chungdam was established by Kim Young-hwa in 1998 and has shown a meteoric rise in the private language academy industry. It was listed on the Kosdaq market in June 2008, and is targeting 102 billion won in sales and 7 billion won in operating profit this year. 


Share this page 
Facebook MySpace Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Google Bookmarks RSS Feed 
Related Posts

Comments (4)

experience at CDI
0
I can relate to the petitioners against CDI for their strict practices against foreign teachers. The term 'freelance' that they seem to keep throwing around is pretty much a bunch of horse poo. In detail, before being selected by CDI, teachers have the choice between hourly and salary wages. The difference is of course, the pay and a slight structure difference in hours but as far as housing, medical support and severance, etc., it is the same. Both types sign a contract to do one year and must follow the same visa requirements.

The big difference is that CDI has franchise and main branches which differ greatly depending managers/owners. They might be teaching the same curriculi and tight 50 min/class structure, but the underlying politics and hearsay definitely get under the teacher's skins.

I disagree though that teacher's should get paid for the week long training before becoming hired. CDI provided the best accomodations and facilities of training along with assistance in medical checks. It allows foreigners a peek into real Korea and a chance to back out on their own terms. If teacher's are hired, they are reimbursed for flight tickets and given a bonus allowance along with their first month's payment.

All in all, it's not worse or better than any other hagwon. At least CDI tries to maintain a universal foundation for all it's branches. The program is they got too greedy and didn't care for the smaller details which are required by Korea's Labor Laws.
mh , March 06, 2011
correction
0
housing for hourly wage teachers is not provided but key money/assistance is.
mh , March 06, 2011
greedy guts..
0
greed. CDI is based on profit and greed and not solely on education and learning.
a guest , August 05, 2011
...
0
I'm going through a similar issue with my employer except that they aren't giving me insurance like in our contract. They have me on a salary contract with the words 'employee' all through it, and it reads exactly what time to come into work...yet they have me registered as a 'freelancer'. My insurance information has been requested 3 times and their story changes everytime. I have video of a doctor pulling up my arc number to show me there is no insurance registered to my ARC card. If my employer is definitely breaching my contract, can I get out? This company acts like they own me. We work more than the mandatory 130 hours too...without being fully compensated...what should I do first?
a guest , September 12, 2011

Write comment

smaller | bigger

busy
Home Jobs Resumes Food & Drink
Classifieds Events Blogs Directory
Korea Forum Community Groove ?
상호:주)유케이피 | 사업자번호 105-87-38724 | 대표: 다니엘에드워즈베렌트 | 전화: 070-7847-7000 (고객지원 1시~4시)
Copyright ⓒ 2010 HiExpat.com All rights reserved. The reproduction or replication of material is not permitted.

Korea Blog - HiExpat.com